The feeling is that diving into the context of the eni villahe, where the relationship between architecture and environment exists and resists, is the perfect situation to call into question the creative person, the “artist”. The village isn’t only a completed endeavor in the most conceptual and planning sense of relationship between nature, physical space and design, but it’s a real, physical place, charged with an active past.
The creative response might be diverse, that depends on the subject of the research and the manner of operating, because this place, that I see how an open container, can create different variables (expectations?).
I feel seminars and workshops being born because of that need: a truly free dialogue between artists, insiders and more, maybe open to a restricted and interested audience, with the intent of pulling out sense and sensations of everyone in regards of this site from the dialogue.
Make the artist emerge, and render them aware of their indipendence or loyalty in regards of their actions, this is one of the objectives: can one put them into question, change them, or perhaps the matrix must remain always the same, indifferent to the specific situation?
And to create an action of awareness is it necessary to bring planning, psico-social roots with oneself, perhaps activating the community, or is it sufficient to operate in a conceptual or merely formal and either way apparently devoid of function phase?
Moreover, it’d be interesting to jump from the dialogue to an active moment, a laboratory in which one puts into play one’s own essence, I’m thinking of artists with experience mixed with young artists and young academy people whom will be able to and will have to get an exchange from us.
